UK and European cleantech firms are consistently failing to adequately protect their intellectual property (IP) and are risking losing funding and compromising their competitiveness as a result.
That is the stark warning from one of the UK's leading IP advisory firms, which claims that as a still emerging sector the cleantech industry has largely failed get to grips with the concept of legally protecting their innovations.
Speaking to BusinessGreen.com, Andrew Watson chief executive of IPVA, said European cleantech firms were lagging far behind their US counterparts in their approach to IP protection, adding that many were failing to file sufficient patents, filing poorly worded patents and failing to identify trade secrets.
"We've seen several horror stories where investment and licensing deals have almost fallen through, because the other company has looked at the IP and found the protection lacking," he said. "There was one company where if it was a US firm it would have filed 100 different patents – in fact it had filed one patent and it was very weak."
Ensuring IP is legally protected is particularly important to cleantech firms, according to Watson, as much of their value is based on research innovation as opposed to products. "A lot of early stage cleantech firms are developing ideas rather than products, and where they do develop products, they license the manufacture out to larger partners," he explained. "As a result, the IP is hugely important to the value of the company, but many firms don't realise this."
A failure to protect IP through patents and trade secrets can also put start ups at a disadvantage when looking to license products to larger manufacturers. "Larger companies will have legal teams who know how to structure licensing deals to benefit them," he said, adding that those companies that did not have a clear IP strategy were at risk of being exploited.
Watson advised cleantech firms to assess their current state of IP protection and develop a strategy to ensure they keep better track of patents and trade secrets.
"A lot of it is cultural," he observed. "In Europe, there is a sense that you have to have developed some seminal science and almost won a Nobel Prize to bother getting a patent. But IP is any idea of value that helps you do things a bit better and you should protect that in the same way you'd protect other areas of competitive advantage."
Senior officials and negotiators increasingly gloomy about the prospects for a global warming deal next month 02 Nov 2009
Proxy filing reveals board will again oppose shareholder calls for Apple to introduce an annual sustainability report 14 Jan 2010
As Tony Blair calls for compromise, African diplomats warn that their leaders will not attend if they expect to face last-minute wrangling 14 Dec 2009
Obama administration to work closely on formal details 15 Jan 2010
Desert tortoise fears allayed? 19 Mar 2010
Cameron presents pre-election energy policy, promising greater investment certainty for low-carbon projects, green loans for households, and streamlining of planning system 19 Mar 2010
Joint statement from carbon exchange and Hungarian government aims to restore confidence in CER market 19 Mar 2010
More news
From climate change contrarians to the "KitKatastrophe" of Nestle's palm oil policy, we look at the best the green web has to offer this week 19 Mar 2010
"It needs the political enthusiasm that was behind the war on terror after 9/11" 19 Mar 2010
From the government's plans for a marine energy revolution to John Lewis' proposals for an off-grid supermarket 19 Mar 2010 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
