Council leaders have been warned to keep better track of the waste they send for recycling after it emerged some waste handling firms are refusing to provide accurate data on recycling rates, increasing the risk that potentially hazardous waste such as electronic equipment could be dumped illegally.
BusinessGreen.com has learnt that Paul Bettison, chairman of the Local Government Association's environment board, has written to 357 council leaders across the country urging them to check that their recycling data is accurate and insist that waste handling firms provide them with information on how much recyclate they are processing and where it is sent.
"Councils typically send recyclate to "sorters" who check it for quality and send it to the appropriate recycler," he explained. "According to Defra they are legally obliged to provide the councils with data on how much is sorted and where it is sent, but we have learnt that some councils are not requesting this data and are assuming everything that is sorted is recycled, while some " sorters" are refusing to hand over the data because they believe it is commercially sensitive."
Bettison said that he had some sympathy for sorting firms who are fearful that handing over such information to councils may prompt them to carry out the sorting work themselves and "cut out the middleman". But he insisted that councils needed to ensure their recycling data was accurate and added that he had also written to the Environment Agency requesting that they "deal robustly" with any waste firm that refuses to provide requested data to councils.
"I'm sure the vast majority of the recyclate that the "sorters" handle is recycled, but given we are asking the public and businesses to support councils' efforts to recycle we need to be able to prove conclusively at all times how much is recycled and where."
He added that an auditable paper trail was particularly important in the wake of a series of scandals that has seen potentially hazardous electronic waste, supposedly intended for reuse, illegally shipped to scrap yards in developing countries.
"If you can prove your waste has gone to "good homes" then when someone does have a spurious claim over where it has ended up you have the evidence you need, " he said. "Also if your waste does end up being handled illegally, an audit trail means you can easily track who is responsible."
Additional reporting by Rosalie Marshall
After initial claims to the contrary, the Environment Agency has confirmed it is looking into firms suspected of illegally shipping electronic waste to scrap yards in Nigeria and Ghana 06 Oct 2008
As UK eWaste continues to poison workers in African scrap yard, critics claim over-stretched Environment Agency is failing to police illegal exporters 22 Aug 2008Enforcement body accused of failing to respond to widespread reports that hazardous e-waste is being dumped illegally 04 Sep 2008
In the wake of the eWaste scandal, fresh evidence emerges that waste intended for recycling is also being illegally shipped to the developing world 08 Sep 2008
Waste regulation failing to stop shipments of broken computers to Africa 22 Aug 2008
Survey of public sector IT managers reveals deep concern over ability to deliver on carbon-neutral targets 03 Jul 2009
Fresh funding will provide new wave energy research equipment and support research 03 Jul 2009
EPA hints it could soon raise efficiency bar for routers, modems and storage systems 03 Jul 2009
More news
From record-breaking solar panels to the International Renewable Energy Agency's new home, we round up the top stories from the past week 03 Jul 2009
Well, I hope they got a no win, no fee deal. I don't like being cynical (it's more of a congenital thing)... 03 Jul 2009
Recycling waste heat is nothing new, so why has the computer industry not kept up? 01 Jul 2009 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
