Firms guilty of overstating their green credentials can expect to face fresh criticism following the launch of a new website that provides consumers with an opportunity to evaluate the green claims made in companies' adverts.
The Greenwashing Index has been launched by US marketing agency EnviroMedia Social Marketing and allows users to post adverts and then rate them against a set of greenwashing criteria.
The criteria, which were developed in conjunction with the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication, cover whether the ad uses misleading words or graphics, makes vague or unprovable claims, overstates a product or services' green credentials or leaves out relevant information.
Visitors will be able to rate adverts based on the criteria and generate scores that will range from "good", to "pushing it", to "total greenwash".
EnviroMedia president Kevin Tuerff said he hoped the Index "will help eradicate bad environmental marketing claims and, at the same time, shine a positive light on companies making measurable reductions in carbon emissions related to climate change".
The site was launched as the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today hosts the first in a series of public workshops designed to review its environmental marketing guidelines.
The review of its so-called green guides had been scheduled for 2009, but late last year the FTC said it would be pulling the review forward in response to growing public concern over green marketing campaigns. The commission is to undertake a series of workshops over the coming months and could update its marketing guidelines to firms based on the results.
In related news, the UK Advertising Standards Authority today upheld a complaint from Friends of the Earth over an advert from the Malaysian Palm Oil Council that claimed its palm oil was " sustainably produced".
The ad, which appeared on BBC World last year, also claimed that palm oil production benefited the environment.
The ASA fully upheld Friends of the Earth International’s complaint that the advert was misleading on the grounds that palm oil production had resulted in widespread deforestation.
The watchdog ruled that the adverts were misleading, "because there was not a consensus that there was a net benefit to the environment from Malaysia's palm oil plantations".
Environmental groups claim more must be done to regulate palm oil production in the region 10 Oct 2008
ASA rules advert claiming tar sands projects are part of a "sustainable future" is misleading 13 Aug 2008
Certificates registered by plantation firm assure wholesale buyers that product has met strict sustainability criteria 19 Sep 2008
As California unveils new building code, Federal Trade Commission undertakes review of greenwashing across the construction sector 21 Jul 2008
Advertising watchdog rules that ad claiming liquefied natural gas was "one of the world's cleanest fuels" was unintentionally misleading 03 Sep 2008
Ecotricity confirms it is taking legal action against the firm for using its image of a green Union flag 10 Jul 2009
Logistics giant claims more efficient planes and use of biofuels will cut emissions by a further 20 per cent cut by 2020 09 Jul 2009
More news
Bill Beaver takes the microscope to the backroom deals that will shape the future of the US climate change bill 09 Jul 2009
Whenever a big story breaks about the dire straights in which the natural world finds itself, it always sparks something of a... 07 Jul 2009
Carbon market activity ticks upwards, as China and India blast "green protectionism" 07 Jul 2009 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
