Firms guilty of overstating their green credentials can expect to face fresh criticism following the launch of a new website that provides consumers with an opportunity to evaluate the green claims made in companies' adverts.
The Greenwashing Index has been launched by US marketing agency EnviroMedia Social Marketing and allows users to post adverts and then rate them against a set of greenwashing criteria.
The criteria, which were developed in conjunction with the University of Oregon School of Journalism and Communication, cover whether the ad uses misleading words or graphics, makes vague or unprovable claims, overstates a product or services' green credentials or leaves out relevant information.
Visitors will be able to rate adverts based on the criteria and generate scores that will range from "good", to "pushing it", to "total greenwash".
EnviroMedia president Kevin Tuerff said he hoped the Index "will help eradicate bad environmental marketing claims and, at the same time, shine a positive light on companies making measurable reductions in carbon emissions related to climate change".
The site was launched as the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC) today hosts the first in a series of public workshops designed to review its environmental marketing guidelines.
The review of its so-called green guides had been scheduled for 2009, but late last year the FTC said it would be pulling the review forward in response to growing public concern over green marketing campaigns. The commission is to undertake a series of workshops over the coming months and could update its marketing guidelines to firms based on the results.
In related news, the UK Advertising Standards Authority today upheld a complaint from Friends of the Earth over an advert from the Malaysian Palm Oil Council that claimed its palm oil was " sustainably produced".
The ad, which appeared on BBC World last year, also claimed that palm oil production benefited the environment.
The ASA fully upheld Friends of the Earth International’s complaint that the advert was misleading on the grounds that palm oil production had resulted in widespread deforestation.
The watchdog ruled that the adverts were misleading, "because there was not a consensus that there was a net benefit to the environment from Malaysia's palm oil plantations".
ASA rules that Malaysian Palm Oil Council's claims that plantations are sustainable and help to tackle poveerty are likely to mislead 02 Nov 2009
Claims that wind farm could cause "depression, sleep deprivation, headaches and memory loss" ruled misleading 19 Feb 2010U-turn comes as study reveals palm plantations store less carbon than previous estimates 17 Aug 2009
ASA rules that use of generic images to promote proposed wind farm development could mislead readers 29 Jul 2009
Heavily trailed proposals to ban sending recyclable material to landfill made public 18 Mar 2010
Government announces extra £4.8m to support offshore wind R&D 18 Mar 2010
Secretary-General and climate envoy cross swords over the extent to which UN talks should be supported by separate negotiations between top polluters 18 Mar 2010
More news
As a journalist, I spend a fair amount of time defending the much maligned media industry to friends and family.... 18 Mar 2010
Andrew Williams casts his eye over some of the most popular green driving aids on the market 16 Mar 2010
From hydropower hot spots to record-breaking Texan winds, we run down the top stories from the past week 12 Mar 2010 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
