The possibility of wide-reaching US environmental legislation took another leap forward this week after a bill was voted through a Senate committee that would see drastic cuts in carbon emissions over the next few decades.
The Climate Security Act 2007, sponsored by Senators John Warner and Joseph Lieberman, would make sweeping changes to the way that America manages its greenhouse gas output.
Under the legislation, the US would freeze greenhouse gas emissions in 2012 and then reduce them by 62 per cent through to 2050. The reduction would be handled using a "cap-and-trade" carbon trading system similar to that already operated in Europe, under which companies would trade the right to produce emissions above a set limit through a national exchange.
The bill is particularly significant given that the US opted out of the Kyoto Protocol, which Australia's new government finally ratified this week. Kyoto calls for an international cap-and-trade system to curb greenhouse emissions.
"Kyoto was roundly rejected in the US but I think the debate is focused on what we do post-Kyoto," said Tobyn Anderson, vice president at DC-based lobbyist Lighthouse Consulting.
Lighthouse consults for the US Climate Action Partnership, a group of US businesses lobbying for greenhouse gas reductions, which Tobyn says has adopted no official stance on the legislation. "The White House hasn't yet embraced a mandatory programme, but the broad consensus in congress is that we do need a mandatory programme post-2012," he added.
The bill still has a long way to go before it becomes law in the US. The senate has to debate the bill, and it will almost certainly be filibustered, say experts – a process in which opposing senators talk the bill to death. The filibuster can be avoided if the bill can secure 60 votes in favour, but amendments during the debate would probably still alter the legislation substantially.
The House Energy and Commerce committee will also introduce other climate legislation that will be subject to a similar vote. Assuming both bills pass, a conference committee must resolve the differences between them before it finally reaches the president's desk. The president, who is in office until January 2009, could then veto the legislation.
"What happened [this week] is an initial step in a very long and complicated process," said Anderson.
Bill demanding mandatory reduction in US emissions could be passed by 2009 19 Oct 2007
New study estimates cap-and-trade scheme proposed in Lieberman-Warner climate bill would be worth $150bn in 2012 14 Feb 2008Bill proposing binding carbon cuts and extensive emissions trading scheme passes key first vote 02 Nov 20071,700 scientists and economists, six Nobel Prize winners and one former prime minister urge US action on climate change 30 May 2008
As San Francisco enacts the US's first carbon tax, institutional investors call on the Senate to support binding emission cuts of up to 90 per cent by 2050 22 May 2008
Intelligent Energy ramps up funding for R&D and partnerships 04 Jul 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
More news
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
