A group of major US investors stepped up pressure on Congress yesterday to introduce new legislation forcing companies to disclose risks and opportunities associated with climate change.
Testifying before a Senate Banking Subcommittee, members of the Ceres coalition of investors and environmental groups argued that legislation was required to ensure businesses properly disclose environmental risks and provide investors with information on the impact to their operations of climate change and mitigation measures.
Russell Read, chief investment officer of the US' largest public pension fund, California Public Employees' Retirement System, said that improved environmental disclosure was required if investors were to properly assess firms' risk profiles.
"There are many companies that do not provide voluntary disclosure of their climate risk," he added.
Jeffrey A. Smith, an environmental law partner at Cravath, Swaine & Moore and former chairman of the American Bar Association's Committee on Environmental Disclosure, agreed that while voluntary corporate disclosure on climate risks had increased in recent years, there was still a pressing need for wider disclosure.
"It would be a mistake to believe that this voluntary activity – no matter how sophisticated and well intentioned – could be a permanent substitute for mandatory reporting," Smith said in his written testimony, adding that the SEC should move to eliminate "the wide variation in the depth, quality and format of formal SEC reporting" by companies on climate change.
The hearing comes in the wake of a petition sent to the SEC by 18 leading US investors responsible for $1.5 trillion of investor assets asking the watchdog to force companies to assess and disclose "material" financial risks from climate change, such as "financial impacts from emerging carbon-reducing regulations, extreme weather and other climate-related physical events, or growing global demand for low-carbon technologies and products".
The move is the latest in a line of initiatives from institutional investors designed to lobby lawmakers worldwide into introducing more stringent environmental reporting legislation. They argue such rules would help investors better assess risks and also encourage firms to develop more coherent and effective climate change policies.
Recent research from the Bill Clinton-backed Carbon Disclosure Project also found an apparent link between environmental and financial performance whereby the companies boasting the best green initiatives also delivered stronger financial performances than their rivals.
Coalition of the world's largest investment groups issue most demanding call yet for emission reductions 15 Feb 2008
Shareholder activists increase pressure on listed firms to improve global warming policies 10 Mar 2008
US Congress proposes legislation to force Environmental Protection Agency to allow California and other states to set their own stringent car emissions rules 10 Mar 2008
As San Francisco enacts the US's first carbon tax, institutional investors call on the Senate to support binding emission cuts of up to 90 per cent by 2050 22 May 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008




