Energy giant npower has had its knuckles rapped by the advertising watchdog this week over a newsletter that it ruled had overstated the carbon savings attained from one of its wind farm developments.
Npower's newsletter had claimed that a planned wind farm in north Devon would help prevent the release of 33,000 tonnes of CO2 a year, but following complaints from an anti-wind farm group, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the figure was out of date and npower's claims broke rules relating to "truthfulness", "environmental claims" and "substantiation".
The watchdog's investigation found that npower's calculations had been based on the assumption that wind power would largely displace coal-fired energy generation and that the figures were "no longer representative" of a UK energy mix increasingly reliant on cleaner gas-fired power.
The ASA warned npower to ensure future carbon saving claims were based on a "more representative and rigorous carbon emissions factor".
In its defence, npower said that its carbon emission reduction calculations had been made using industry standard figures recommended by the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA).
"This figure has previously been upheld by the ASA as the correct one to use for carbon dioxide offsets by wind farms," the company said in a statement. " The BWEA is already liaising with the ASA to arrive at a mechanism that's updated and universally accepted. The last thing we want is to confuse people. We'll follow a new accepted industry standard when we have it."
The ruling highlights the close eye the ASA is keeping on firms' environmental claims. Earlier this year the watchdog released a checklist for firms looking to promote their green credentials, reminding them to get their facts right, avoid using "pseudo-science" and curb sweeping claims such as " environmentally-friendly".
Speaking at the launch of the checklist, ASA director general Christopher Graham warned that the organisation would be keeping a close eye on those that overstate their environmental benefits.
“Advertisers have every right to promote their green credentials and many have been quick to reassure consumers about the efforts they are making to be greener," he said. "However, the ASA needs to see robust evidence to back up any eco-friendly claims."
ASA upholds Friends of the Earth complaint claiming oil giant's advert promoting green activities misled readers 07 Nov 2007
ASA upholds complaint that Boeing ad overstates per passenger carbon savings from new 747-8 Intercontinental 28 Nov 2007
Engineering giants will co-operate on development and promotion of IGCC and carbon capture technologies 28 May 2008
Advertising watchdog upholds complaints against claims new bioethanol-powered car "does not significantly raise atmospheric levels of CO2" 05 Mar 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008





