11 Oct 2007
Energy giant npower has had its knuckles rapped by the advertising watchdog this week over a newsletter that it ruled had overstated the carbon savings attained from one of its wind farm developments.
Npower's newsletter had claimed that a planned wind farm in north Devon would help prevent the release of 33,000 tonnes of CO2 a year, but following complaints from an anti-wind farm group, the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) ruled the figure was out of date and npower's claims broke rules relating to "truthfulness", "environmental claims" and "substantiation".
The watchdog's investigation found that npower's calculations had been based on the assumption that wind power would largely displace coal-fired energy generation and that the figures were "no longer representative" of a UK energy mix increasingly reliant on cleaner gas-fired power.
The ASA warned npower to ensure future carbon saving claims were based on a "more representative and rigorous carbon emissions factor".
In its defence, npower said that its carbon emission reduction calculations had been made using industry standard figures recommended by the British Wind Energy Association (BWEA).
"This figure has previously been upheld by the ASA as the correct one to use for carbon dioxide offsets by wind farms," the company said in a statement. " The BWEA is already liaising with the ASA to arrive at a mechanism that's updated and universally accepted. The last thing we want is to confuse people. We'll follow a new accepted industry standard when we have it."
The ruling highlights the close eye the ASA is keeping on firms' environmental claims. Earlier this year the watchdog released a checklist for firms looking to promote their green credentials, reminding them to get their facts right, avoid using "pseudo-science" and curb sweeping claims such as " environmentally-friendly".
Speaking at the launch of the checklist, ASA director general Christopher Graham warned that the organisation would be keeping a close eye on those that overstate their environmental benefits.
“Advertisers have every right to promote their green credentials and many have been quick to reassure consumers about the efforts they are making to be greener," he said. "However, the ASA needs to see robust evidence to back up any eco-friendly claims."
LATEST STORIES ABOUT MARKETING
YOU MAY ALSO LIKE
LATEST JOBS
TODAY'S TOP STORIES
HIGHLIGHT
The best green companies in the UK should be preparing their entries for annual BusinessGreen Leaders Awards
INSIGHT
INSIGHT
The science and practical application of an improved method for the specification of power and cooling infrastructure for data centres
A look at alternative approaches to managing energy for cost and/or sustainability reasons in data centres
WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment
npower's hypocrisy
Npower is again claiming that they are displacing coal burning with their wind farms to make the carbon savings look twice as good. They know that it is unrealistic but are desperate to grab the massive subsidies available to wind farms. Mind you, if the UK power industry continues cutting back on their use of gas and burning more (cheaper) coal, their claims may soon be true! They have already raised their CO2 emissions by 30% - wiping out any savings from meeting the 2010 renewables target three times over.
Posted by Brian Skittrall, 17 Oct 2007