How much more will low-carbon energy cost?

The price of decarbonising versus the price of business as usual: both are variables

By Andrew Charlesworth

28 Jul 2010

Be the first to comment

Ofgem and others have estimated that the cost of overhauling the UK’s energy infrastructure will cost some £200bn.

The vast sum of money reflects the gigantic task: decarbonising energy generation, weaning ourselves off of fossil fuels for much of private and public transport, reducing domestic and industrial demand through radical energy conservation measures, and replacing our current ‘dumb’ distribution grid with a smart one.

The debate about whether this will happen is largely over; the focus now is on how fast? Those who oppose rapid decarbonisation usually cite the cost. Decarbonising energy production will cause huge rises in energy bills rise for consumers and business, they argue, conjuring up the spectre of hypothermic pensioners and energy-intensive businesses fleeing the UK for less carbon-averse shores.

But saying low-carbon energy will cost more implies a comparison. More than what exactly?

If the assumption is that decarbonised energy will cost more than what we do now – that is, largely rely on fossil fuels – then any increase in the price of those fuels has to be factored into the comparison.

The price of oil and gas are fairly closely linked. If the price of oil remains where it is today at roughly $80 a barrel, then, according to analysis from DECC, decarbonising energy generation will cost businesses and consumers more than if we stuck with fossils.

But at $100 a barrel, oil and gas start to become more expensive over the long run than low-carbon energy. And that’s without factoring in the environmental externalities.

At $108 a barrel, the saving from green energy becomes even greater. And who would bet against oil prices spiking again like they did a few years ago?

No one denies that energy is going to become more expensive, but this applies to all forms of energy, not just the low-carbon variety.

"While we welcome the transparency that [DECC's reports] bring, they fail to give businesses the direction and certainty they desperately need to make investment decisions today that will deliver the energy they need tomorrow," says Andrew Horstead, energy risk analyst at carbon specialists Utilyx.

"For example, small scale renewable projects can help to reduce energy spend and the costs associated with energy delivery and the savings could run into tens of millions over a fifteen year period," he adds. "This is real money, real savings and a real opportunity to boost sources of renewable energy in the UK. More must be done by the government to encourage these projects in the business community and make them aware of the potential rewards that renewable projects can offer.”

The simple argument that low-carbon energy will be more expensive than fossils is a fallacy that the proponents of green energy need to challenge more often.

WHAT DO YOU THINK? Add your comment

  

As campaigners again write to Nick Clegg demanding action on mandatory carbon reporting rules, would your business like to see standardised rules enacted?

75%

16%

9%

NEWSLETTER

Information currently unavailable.
bg-cit2

Smart working in the 21st century

This new handbook explores practices that allow organisations to overcome their technological limitations and traditional office-culture challenges - freeing employees to do more with less from wherever they want to.

RISO

Colour printing: a licence to waste

The centralised printers used in many businesses are wasteful, unreliable and expensive to run - just as their suppliers intend