An environmental charity opposed to Royal Mail building a new depot on 45 acres of Essex marshland has vowed to continue its campaign despite Royal Mail saying it has abandoned plans to move in.
Yesterday, the Telegraph reported victory for the Invertebrate Conservation Trust, aka Buglife, which promotes the conservation of insects, arachnids and so on. But today the Trust said it would continue its campaign because it suspects that Royal Mail has only delayed its decision.
“Our position remains that until such time as Royal Mail issues an incontrovertible statement that they will never occupy the West Thurrock Marshes site, then they and their distribution hub remain a real threat to the endangered wildlife of this extraordinary site,” Jamie Roberts, Buglife projects manager, told BusinessGreen.com
However, Royal Mail’s press office is unequivocal that there are no secret plans afoot.
“Royal Mail doesn’t have any plans to move onto the site… hasn’t filed a planning application for the site… and has been looking at alternative sites for some months,” a spokesperson told BusinessGreen.com
Buglife fought an unsuccessful High Court action in February to contest the planning approval of the site and subsequent development. Letters sent to the High Court last June, seen by BusinessGreen.com, clearly show Royal Mail as the intended tenant of the site and highlight the “unquantifiable likely costs and impact on the Mail’s quality of service” should litigation prevent Royal Mail from moving in to the site later than September 2008.
Royal Mail wanted the Thurrock site as a regional distribution centre, to replace the centre on Stephenson Road, Canning Town, which the company has to vacate by December 2008 because it is earmarked for redevelopment under the 2012 Olympics scheme.
Outline planning approval for the West Thurrock site was granted last year by Thurrock Thames Gateway Development Corporation (TTGDC) to Rosemound Developments (now part of Goodman Property Investments).
Buglife’s High Court case, citing the Natural Environment and Rural Communities Act (2006), claimed the planned depot would cause “catastrophic damage” to rare, indigenous, invertebrate wildlife. Thurrock Council, which was ousted from the planning process by TTGDC, said that it would not have approved the application on environmental grounds if it had still been in charge of the planning process.
However, the judge, Justice Mitting, accepted Rosemound’s view that the environmental damage would only occur while the site was being developed, not once it was in operation as a Royal Mail Depot.
Communication outsourcing specialist FST Technologies has revealed plans to calculate the carbon footprint of firms' direct mail 06 Feb 2008
Intelligent Energy ramps up funding for R&D and partnerships 04 Jul 2008
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
More news
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
