BusinessGreen: What are you looking for on a supplier audit?
Karl Daumueller: The basis for HP's
auditing is the electronic industry code of conduct, which was introduced in
2004. It covers four areas: labour, including provisions on wages, overtime,
child labour and discrimination; the environment, including pollution
prevention, resource reduction, how suppliers are dealing with waste, water and
chemicals and content restriction policies that ensure they are adhering to our
list of banned substances; health and safety rules; and ethical guidelines that
tackle corruption. All four of these elements have to be managed properly by the
supplier through a formal management system.
How do these audits work?
The audit is a key element of our supplier engagement model. We have done 400
audits in the past three years. The audits last at least two days and require of
a minimum of two auditors. We typically have one auditor looking at ethics and
labour conditions and another focused on the environment and health and safety.
We start with an opening conference with the supplier, then we take a tour of
the factory floor, interview management and staff, undertake a document review
and finally assess specific issues, such as the handling of hazardous
substances. We then undertake a closing meeting where we make plain our findings
with a full audit report that includes any recommendations for improvements.
What happens then?
The company has to respond to the audit within four weeks explaining their
corrective actions and then we undertake a follow up audit after one year to
check those have been adequately undertaken.
Does the supplier have any notice that you are coming?
We give the suppliers two weeks' notice. We haven't done spot checks.
But doesn't that give suppliers the opportunity to only put in place
environmental and work place best practices when they know you are
coming?
We have 40 well-trained auditors globally who know how to look for evidence that
the supplier may have just temporarily changed things for their benefit. The
approach is not one of policing. The aim is to share best practice and help
improve and promote sustainability across the supply chain. Because it is
difficult to switch from one supplier to another in the electronics industry,
the focus is very much on working together to deliver improvements in standards.
Is this co-operative approach delivering quantifiable improvements?
It is definitely working. I have recently worked on around 12 follow-up
audits in central Europe and in every case you can see significant improvements.
We have been looking closely at areas like reducing energy use and waste and we
are now seeing that these companies have formal programmes in place to tackle
these problems.
What do you do when you find a supplier who does not meet HP's
standards?
We differentiate between major non-conformers and minor non-conformers. Major
non-conformers have to fix the problem within 60 days and if we then go back and
still find a problem they will get one last warning. We have had very few cases
where they don’t rectify the problem.
It must happen in some cases though. What happens when suppliers
won’t improve, do they get axed?
Well, I believe that we've had three cases in the past three years where we have
terminated a supplier's contract because of their failure to improve standards.
How do you plan to improve the auditing process?
We are continuing to invest in supplier capability building, particularly among
smaller second-tier suppliers. For example, we currently have 30 suppliers in
China in a one-year training programme focused on developing strong management
systems, and we are going to launch a supplier capability programme in India.
About Karl Daumueller
Karl Daumueller is a programme manager within Hewlett-Packard’s Global Procurement Services organisation and lead auditor on the Supply Chain Social and Environmental (SC SER) programme.
Karl joined HP in 1979 and has subsequently worked in a number of roles across the company, including product development and design, production and sourcing. Over the past three years he has been involved in the SC SER programme and has conducted more than 40 audits.
New chemicals legislation could see large numbers of chemicals currently used by manufacturers disappear from the market 12 Dec 2007
Mixed messages are paralysing many firms' environmental efforts. Emma Stewart argues that it is time for sustainability advisors to make life easier for corporate executives 03 Jun 2008
Adam Lowry, co-founder of green cleaning products company Method, explains why green firms cannot afford to neglect design and performance when developing new products 05 Dec 2007
Douglas Johnson of the Consumer Electronics Association insists regulators should consider the success of voluntary energy efficiency programmes before forcing standards on manufacturers 06 Dec 2007
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008


