Last month’s Storage Expo show was keen to highlight its green credentials, with almost every storage vendor in attendance waving their environmental cards around like there was no tomorrow (which, if you believe Al Gore, there might not be).
A special Green IT Zone provided salesmen from the likes of Brocade, IBM, Plasmon and Pillar Data Systems with a soapbox to proclaim the sustainable benefits of their wares. No rotten eggs were thrown, but something did not smell too good all the same.
Some of the speakers boasted they were members of Greenpeace and talked convincingly about the need to make better use of the earth’s scarce natural resources. But one or two were ready to drop the façade and admit that gassing on about reducing carbon footprints in the datacentre is more about saving money through improved operational efficiencies than it is about saving the planet.
Because let’s face it, how many IT managers would be rushing to install more environmentally friendly networking and storage equipment in their premises if they thought for a minute that it would cost them more, rather than less, money to run it?
The whole impetus for jumping on the green bandwagon stems from the pressing need to increase energy efficiency either because the monthly utility bills are spiralling out of control, or because firms are simply finding it impossible to get their hands on enough kilowatts to power the stuff they already have.
For most, being green is nothing more than a by-product of doing everything they can to build datacentres that provide increased storage capacity while also being less costly to run. As one punter said, it’s a cynical attitude, but then it’s a cynical world.
According to a survey by archiving firm Plasmon, IT professionals are evenly split in their motives. Half said they are adopting greener systems to help save the environment, while the other half said they just wanted to save money. What is interesting is that attitudes differ markedly across industry sectors. For instance, the financial sector appears more concerned about enhancing its image by appearing environmentally friendly, while manufacturing is happy to admit it is focused very much on improving its bottom line.
And let’s not forget that if the need to reduce that electricity consumption is so acute now, the fact that vendors did not give a second thought to power efficiency five years ago has a lot to do with it. Was nobody bothered about saving the planet when there was enough electricity to go around and the utility companies were not putting their prices up?
‹ martin.courtney@incisivemedia.com
Social networking sites, online gaming, YouTube, iPlayer, you name it – they all boost internet activity. But what's the effect of all this activity on the environment? 07 May 2008
As storage vendors gather today for Storage Expo in London, Chris James of Overland Storage argues that with the data explosion at many firms continuing they must do more than just buy the most energy efficient kit 17 Oct 2007
Over the past few years the IT sector has transformed itself from an industry with the kind of environmental record that made strip mining look pretty conscientious into a champion of green business practices. So what has driven this change, and what does it mean for corporate IT chiefs? 11 Sep 2007
The term 'Carbon Neutral' may be all the rage, observes Amy Sims, but firms should avoid taking it at face value 16 Aug 2007
Focus on energy savings through fuel efficiency for homes and public and commercial buildings 04 Jul 2008
ActionAid accuses G8 of driving more people into poverty by pursing biofuels and cutting agri-aid 04 Jul 2008
Businesses' new found focus on the environment may be welcome, but according to Conrad MacKerron, it is taking attention away from workers' rights issues – and the credibility of the entire green business movement could be at risk 03 Jul 2008
It may be a year old, but as Dell's Jonathan Perry explains, firms looking to get rid of their old IT kit still need to pay attention to the WEEE directive 02 Jul 2008
Telling customers about your environmental targets is all well and good but, as Paul Thomas argues, they are meaningless if you do not know how they are to be achieved 01 Jul 2008



