Greenpeace has praised Apple for its recycling programme and its efforts to remove toxic chemicals from its products.
The environmental campaign group listed Apple at the bottom of its rankings in April.
But the company has now moved ahead of Sony, LG Electronics, Panasonic and HP to tenth place on the 14-company Green Electronics Guide ranking. Nokia, Dell and Lenovo topped the list.
The ranking is based on the use of toxic chemicals, initiatives to phase out such materials and recycling policies for high-tech consumer goods.
Greenpeace highlighted Apple's policies on PVC and brominated flame retardants as principal reasons for the improved assessment. The organisation particularly praised Apple's pledge to remove the substances from all its products by 2008.
Apple was also congratulated on its goal to recycle 30 per cent of its products by 2010, and the volume yielded by Apple's current recycling practices. The computer maker currently takes in 9.5 per cent of products sold seven years ago.
But Apple's ranking in the lower half of the list indicated that there is still much room for improvement. Apple still does not do enough to follow the so-called Precautionary Principle in its environmental policies, according to Greenpeace.
The organisation also knocked the principles of Apple's recycling programme, contending that, despite the large amount recycled, the programme does not extend worldwide and fails to provide enough education to customers.
Greenpeace has previously targeted Apple in a special campaign called Green My Apple in which it accused the firm of doing nothing to improve its environmental policies.
Greenpeace explained to vnunet.com that the group is especially vocal in regards to Apple because it sees the company as an industry leader capable of influencing other vendors to adopt better policies.
Apple initially shrugged off the Greenpeace report, claiming that the company is years ahead of other vendors in its practices.
Greenpeace's efforts have, however, prompted Apple chief executive Steve Jobs to release a public report outlining Apple's environmental policies and its plans for the future.
Apple did not respond to a request for comment on the latest rankings.
PC maker has made 'no progress whatsoever', says environment group 04 Apr 2007
Carbon-offset programme will cost buyers £1 per laptop and £3 per desktop 06 Jun 2007
Firm plans to plant trees to offset carbon emissions from its computers 11 Jan 2007
Smartphone still using PVC and BFRs, claims environment group 16 Oct 2007
Tests undertaken by environmental lobby group finds iPhone contains hazardous substances already eradicated by some rival phone manufacturers 15 Oct 2007"The marketing is greener than the product," claim campaigners 03 Mar 2008
Company responds to Greenpeace criticism with statement insisting iPhone meets all legal standards on hazardous substances 16 Oct 2007
Report claims controversial practice of shipping recyclates half way round the world results in net carbon reduction 20 Aug 2008
Influential committee of peers urges government to accelerate plans for lower VAT rates on green products and services 20 Aug 2008
Companies advised that they can cut down brand and operational risks by understanding how much water their products use 20 Aug 2008
More news
As the reputational risks associated with greenwash become more apparent every day, Paul Thomas asks why some firms still find themselves overstating their environmental credentials 20 Aug 2008
Emissions trading is widely touted as one of the best mechanisms for tackling climate change, but how do these schemes work and how will your business be affected? Tom Young investigates three of the emissions trading schemes having an impact on UK firms 19 Aug 2008
For environmentalists, politicians and business leaders alike, framing the climate change debate in the right terms is essential to driving engagement 14 Aug 2008 More in-depth
Post your comment
Send an email to the Business Green editor at feedback@businessgreen.com
